Ruby on Rails vs PHP – RailsEnvy.com Commercial #3

Gregg Pollack and Jason Seifer from RailsEnvy.com do some Ruby on Rails commercials in the same style of the Mac vs PC ads. Videos produced by Jason Hawkins of MakeFilmWork.com.

25 Responses to “Ruby on Rails vs PHP – RailsEnvy.com Commercial #3”

  1. Andrial12 says:

    Frameworks are for people who can’t code properly

  2. exceilence says:

    delete rube???

    fuck you bitch

    I fuck your mouth

  3. admLoki says:

    yum erase php5

  4. admLoki says:

    Go on, PHP developer.

  5. satikass says:

    yeah, php ==ftw.
    delete(”ruby”);

  6. betobonix says:

    ok, now where is the Zend Framework vs Ruby language?

  7. ciaoarron says:

    I’d have to agree with the other comments on your videos; it’s comparing PHP to a framework, it’s like comparing a pack of nuts and bolts to a kitset Mecano.

  8. Andrial12 says:

    ruby != own

  9. tienloc47 says:

    noob! it’s SQL.

  10. haloandre says:

    Whats sequel?

  11. boon4376 says:

    I just discovered and am learning RoR… Lets you get right to making stuff less time organizing, configuring, setting up the basics.. etc

  12. vrijdom23 says:

    This video is full of crap.
    Just that php has a lot of hobby crappy non-developers, and gives them the freedom of writing shit, doesnt mean php is shit.
    In php you can also write perfectly following MVC.
    It’s the developer, not the language.

  13. cyzarcoe says:

    php and ruby at good coz i use both of them.. but on this video. you compare it the wrong way.. you should compare zend, php cake, codeigniter or any framework base on php.. cake php and ror at more likely the same.

  14. SLiMxShANuS says:

    PHP is old news.
    Ruby and .erb own.

    Peace.

  15. goobernutz says:

    You’ve totally missed the point. One guy is supposed to be dorky and lame, not BOTH of them. I mean, ruby tuesday on the right has pipe-cleaner arms, a shiny scalp AND a beer belly! HAHA. At least tubby on the left can probably name a sports team or something.

  16. rumco says:

    comparing a framework with a language? misleading and childish. compare a major PHP framework (Symfony, Zend etc.) with Ruby (not ROR!!) and see how well it’ll do!

  17. barbushin says:

    Sucks… realy sucks

  18. meskyanichi says:

    Goodbye

  19. meskyanichi says:

    Of course you could compare Ruby to PHP, but that wouldn’t make a difference cause PHP really doesn’t have pretty syntax and isn’t as functional as Ruby’s fully OO syntax.

    You know what I like about PHP? It’s how we always have to guess what comes first when calling a function, is it the “Needle” or the “Haystack”?

  20. ArchSaur says:

    I think he meant side by side with HTML, not actually in it.
    Anyway I don’t like PHP, but I have to agree it does the job (well, mostly) if used properly.

    The best notice here is that PHP should be compared to Ruby, not ROR, ’cause ROR is framework.
    In this video it would’ve been better to compare PHP Zend framework to ROR – that would be really good one since Zend seem to suck very very hard.

  21. supadox says:

    lol SQL itches :D

  22. dustout2 says:

    I have worked with quite a bit of PHP, and no nothing about RoR and i must admit these commercials are quite effective. I’ll be looking into RoR some more :)

  23. TenMillionViews says:

    Ruby on rails is fail.
    PHP is the future.

    Bye.

  24. autonuker says:

    Why you compare Ror and php.
    Language and FrameWork.
    Can you compare Ruby and symfony

  25. whodares2000 says:

    Can you really have a working SQL code in an HTML? I mean isn’t HTML a client side thingy?

Leave a Reply